Cloud seeding boosts rain by just 5–15% in ideal conditions. Experts clarify it can’t cause devastating floods like the ...

Florida’s Attorney General James Uthmeier jumped in to amplify the misinformation — citing a newly passed Florida law banning ...

Cloud-seeding operations take place in at least nine U.S. states as of 2024, according to data from the United States ...

Cloud seeding has been conducted off and in the central Sierra — including the north fork of the Stanislaus River — since the ...

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) announced over the weekend that she plans to introduce federal legislation to ban weather ...

A federal bill calling for a nationwide ban of cloud seeding and other weather modification could end Wyoming’s controversial ...

Regardless, the process cannot create storms out of thin air. Ken Leppert, an associate professor of atmospheric science at ...

A new law bans companies and people from modifying the weather in Florida, including cloud seeding. On July 1, Senate Bill 56 ...

Scientists blame unusually warm oceans, not cloud seeding, for Texas and North Carolina floods. Yet state lawmakers seek to ban geoengineering, though no such projects exist in North Carolina.

A small contingent of lawmakers are blaming silver iodide for extreme weather events, including the disastrous flooding in Texas, but at least they're getting closer to the truth.

A nine-year, $14 million study says that cloud seeding can increase snowfall, and some officials in thirsty Arizona say it’s time to ramp it up. The study is the most ambitious and expensive ...

More and more voices, including politicians, say that cloud seeding — or man-made ways of increasing precipitation — caused the deadly floods in Texas. Experts say this is damaging public trust.