New court disavows a 1993 Iowa appellate decision that reversed a sex abuse conviction because of doubts about child victims' testimony.

A clause concerning the hurting of religious sentiments has been added to the case filed by Chawkbazar Police Station against Shreesanth Roy, a student of the Bangladesh University of Engineering and ...

The Minnesota Supreme Court on Wednesday delivered a win to a transgender weightlifter, even while keeping part of the case alive for the organization that banned her from competing in its women's ...

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority signaled it could upend a central pillar of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The question at the heart of arguments is whether lawmakers can use race as a factor ...

Sketch artist Dana Verkouteren was in court for today’s oral arguments on the Voting Rights Act. See her sketches here: The Supreme Court’s conservative majority signaled deep skepticism today over a ...

Washington — Members of the Supreme Court's conservative majority appeared open Wednesday to raising the bar for successfully challenging voting maps under a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, a ...

During oral arguments on Wednesday in Louisiana v. Callais, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson forcefully rebuked an attorney defending Louisiana’s congressional map, interrupting his claim that plaintiffs ...

What is it with lawyers and AI? We don’t know, but it feels like an inordinate number of them keep screwing up with AI tools, apparently never learning from their colleagues who get publicly crucified ...

Voting rights activists gather outside the Supreme Court in Washington, early Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2025, as the justices prepare to take up a major Republican-led challenge to the Voting Rights Act, ...

WASHINGTON — Oral arguments wrapped earlier today in U.S. Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, which concerns equal representation for Black voters in Louisiana and the role of race in redistricting ...

NOW AT THE ARGUMENTS. MONTGOMERY’S APPEAL HINGES ON THREE DIFFERENT ARGUMENTS. THE FIRST IS THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN TRIED SEPARATELY ON ASSAULT AND THEN MURDER. NEXT, THE COURT SHOULD NOT HAVE ...